Skip to main content

Business and Ethics don’t go hand in hand these days

In the 21st century, notoriously known for cut-throat competition, the theory of business ethics appears to be fast losing ground to profitability concept thereby narrowing the scope for preaching and practicing the philosophy of ethical standards in business. We have been taught and reminded of this jargon since our childhood as if being indispensable lessons for successful Business people. But going by Hume’s theory which suggests, “The strength of belief be a product of repetition.”, and there are not enough real-life examples that’s why we tend to deviate from the idea of morals and ethics. 





In 2016, the presidential election of the United States was manipulated by a company called California Analytics which bought the data about demography from Facebook and influenced the people's opinion in a big way into supporting the particular candidate. If the top 500 fortune companies of the world like Facebook hardly stand the scrutiny of, let alone other hapless sections belong to the proletariat class of the country.

Let’s take another example of the 2008 global crisis in which companies like Lehman Brothers, Goldman Sachs, AIG Group played havoc with the sentiments of the economic interest of people across the globe to be flourished in their business pursuit. Their actions led to the suffering of the whole world,  and the only reason for the great global economic depression of 2008 was nothing but found compromising on the terms of morals and ethics. To date the economies of PIGS countries are suffering just because the moral compass of these companies was focussed on profitability.

Albeit, these may be the situation of most of the companies in the world but there are companies which are quintessential examples of moral and ethics. In this list Tata Group is definitely on the top of the pyramid whose whole principle and code of business is based on ethics and values and development of people in particular and the nation as a whole. Eminent Personality and Chairman of Tata Group Ratan Tata is an epitome of ethical and moral values and a role model to be emulated by one and all.


He has always been resolute in his resolve to remain committed to ethical standards in business and has never compromised on moral and ethical values. In an interview Ratan Tata was asked why are you not the richest person of India, his answer was I’m an industrialist and not a businessman, my whole principle revolves around the concept of national development and progress of its people and just not increasing personal wealth.




Of course, moral and ethics are the most important pillars of any business establishment, however hard, it may be to practice in real life equally important for an individual human being, but in today’s world where profitability is the key factor, the statement some time appears not to align with the ground realities for reasons. We always focus on short term goals. We should always keep in mind profit helps us to perform, but ethics helps us to establish the business by winning the hearts of people. Also, profit and ethics don’t overlap nor they are mutually exclusive in the long run.

Comments

Popular Posts

Will the flight from economic distress beats the fight against COVID-19 virus?

Will the flight from economic distress beats the fight against COVID-19 virus? The economy of India is going to face an output loss of $190 bn(according to Nilesh Shah, MD, Kotak Mahindra Asset Management Company) as the wheels of commerce have been ground to halt. The arithmetic of the GDP of India is about $3 trillion, if it remains shut down for a month with a 100% drop inactivity it will create an output loss of $250 bn but as it is likely to be shut for 47 days it will create an output loss of $190 bn assuming that it will open on May 17.  Albeit, there could be a beacon of hope as the oil price has seen a significant reduction due to less demand in the world, it will provide $40-45 bn of benefit in terms of trade deficit this year. Another way to decrease this is to replace China-made goods with India made products, it will create $20 bn benefit in trade deficit. But still willy-nilly it will create $100 billion or thereabouts of output loss which is a signifi...

Jeff Bezos may become the world’s first trillionaire by 2026

In the recent study conducted, by Comparisun, of 25 individuals company analysed, only eleven have the chance to become a trillionaire during their lifetime. According to the study, Jeff Bezos is most likely to become the first trillionaire by 2026  when he will be aged 62. Despite losing an estimated $38 billion in divorce and even more in the pandemic, Jeff is still the richest persons and his net worth growing at a rate of 34% on average to past five years. With a current net worth of 142.8 billion and if the arithmetic goes right he would easily become a trillionaire($1000 billion) by 2026. There are many other names to this list, India richest Mukesh Ambani could become a trillionaire by 2033 at age 75. Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg could gain this title after 2036 with his current growth rate. Alibaba’s Jack Ma could become a trillionaire in 2030 when he will be aged 65. For the study, Comparisun analysed the market capitalisation of the highest value com...

One Nation One Election

Elections are the most important part of any democratic country. Different countries have different methods to elect their representatives to form the government. Unlike the US where Presidential elections are conducted, India has national elections for the formation of a new Parliament (to elect new members of Parliament) to form a new govt at the center headed by the PM with his council of ministers. Similarly, election for formation of new State Legislative Assembly( by electing new members of legislative assembly)to form new govt headed by CM with his council of ministers. But, curiously enough, the above two sets of elections are seldom conducted simultaneously with the result our country happens to witness mini elections round the year causing immense financial strain on exchequer besides causing unwanted and avoidable shifting of manpower from productive deployment to manage these mini elections.  So, with the changing demography the countries have their own modus operandi...